Abandonó el Miss Venezuela por propuesta indecente

Vivian Sleiman, quien concursó para Miss Venezuela pero no siguió adelante por una “propuesta indecente” de un miembro del jurado, publicó Virgen a los treinta, donde explica por qué preservará su castidad hasta que encuentre el amor verdadero

“Escribirlo fue para mí una catarsis”, confesó al diario ABC la joven, que quiere contar su vida pero sin pretensiones literarias. Su relato se lee como el sencillo diario de una bella mujer que cuenta su experiencia con el sexo opuesto desde la determinación de “preservar la virginidad hasta encontrar el amor verdadero”, según una nota que publica el periódico español.

Vivian es alta y esbelta, lo que la llevó a ser modelo durante siete años para solventar sus estudios de nutricionista en la Universidad Central de Venezuela. Sus medidas perfectas, 90-60-90, la llevaron a participar del concurso Miss Venezuela en 2001, certamen que abandonó porque, según contó, alguien del jurado quiso acostarse con ella como condición para que se alzara con la corona.

En Venezuela, país que la vio nacer y donde las mujeres pierden la virginidad a muy corta edad, el libro se convirtió en todo un éxito. Los 8 mil ejemplares de su primera edición se agotaron enseguida.

Sleiman no tiene ningún trastorno sexual, solo es conservadora y respeta a rajatabla sus valores morales. De raíces musulmanas y cristianas, es la hija menor de cuatro hermanos varones. Sus padres se establecieron en Venezuela y se divorciaron cuando ella tenía doce años.

La joven se refirió a su madre, Blanca, su gran referente en la vida y su compañera incondicionalm de esta manera: “Una santa, porque sólo ha besado a un hombre, que es mi padre, a pesar de que no lo amaba”.

Comentarios Facebook

Shinta

07/04/2012 - 1:07 AM

Juan, this is not new. I know for a fact that people over 60 -after doing weahtver diligencia they ought to do- have been getting their pension, monthly, on time, without problem for a while now. I think in Xmas they get a bonus of some sort. Crucially, this has also been applied to an extent to amas de casa. They have to pay up what would have amounted to minimum contribution over a number of years, as if in regular employment, and then they too get their pension.This, I will say without compunctions, is one of the things we should all give credit to Chavez for. It is one of the really good things that he’s done, and he should be commended for it. I think we can all remember, back in the day, viejitos protesting and blocking Av. Urdaneta for lack of payment of meagre pensions, which at the time, in memory serves, was well below minimum salary.As per the video, I agree with you. Extremely difficult to argue against that. The extraordinary thing about chavismo’s propaganda has been that it identified very early the need to communicate to its constituency in visual terms, through imagery. Indeed the use of imagery for propaganda purposes is another thing we should all give credit to Chavez, not because he invented it, after all Socialist Realism can be traced back to other places, but the adaptation of it within the contemporary Venezuelan political context can only be attributed to whoever handles the propaganda for Chavez. In fact, as far as successful methods of communicating a given message, it is important to note that use of imagery by chavismo, and association of red with Bolivar -an icon already well established in the Venezuelan psyche- surpasses weahtver literary or indeed any other communication method used by chavismo to date. Chavismo is yet to produce a half coherent manifesto or statement of principles of what socialism of the XXI century means, whereas it has unquestionably and successfully sold it to a great deal of people in Venezuela.Chavez knows his constituent very well, he knows they are, for the most part, poorly educated. It follows that poorly educated folks don’t question images, communication through imagery is processed differently, and it goes in pretty much unchallenged. What he’s done in that regard is a stroke of genius, and no amount of HCR, Maria Corina, et al is going to change that.On the other hand however, successful as he is in conveying his message, the truly titanic struggle isn’t there Juan. Rather it has to do with his unlimited spending power. That, and no other, is Chavez’s more lethal weapon. In a country of pediguef1os, of people that want to get something for nothing, of people who are convinced that the State has to solve each and every issue or give them the hard cold cash so they can do it themselves, there’s no beating Chavez, even when it means having to queue, register, and chase monies around different misiones.

Responder